Increasing Students' Vocabulary Through ESA Method

Authors

  • La Mido FKIP, Unidayan Baubau

Keywords:

Teachers’ Efforts, Passive Learners, Student Participation

Abstract

The goals of this study were to see if the ESA method can improve students' vocabulary in the eighth year of SMP Negeri 10 Buton Tengah, and if the students in the eighth year of SMP Negeri 10 Buton Tengah can improve their vocabulary in the eighth year of SMP Negeri 10 Buton tengah are interested in learning vocabulary through ESA method or not. This study used two types of variables: independent and dependent variables. The ESA method was the The vocabulary of the students served as an independent variable, and the vocabulary of the students served as a dependent variable. The students' vocabulary achievement was the focus in this case. The VIII1 class, which had 19 students, served as the study's sample. The instruments that were used to collect the data in this research were essay test (pretest and posttest) and questionnaire. The technique used in analyzing the data about the students’ vocabulary achievement at the eighth year of SMP Negeri 10 Buton Tengah was a percentage analysis. The finding indicated that (1) the use of ESA method applied at the eighth year students of SMP Negeri 10 Buton Tengah had a significant effect on the students’ vocabulary achievement with the mean score of pretest was 57.9 with fairly good classification, and the mean score of posttest was 70.87 with good classification. Furthermore, the difference between the result of pretest and posttest based on the result of t-test was at the significant level (t-test) was 10.02, and (2) the eighth year students of SMP Negeri 10 Buton tengah  are interested in studying English vocabularies through the use of ESA method; this thing can be shown by the mean score of interest namely 50.2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Eviyanti, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Prancis dengan Menggunakan Jeux,” Bhs. dan Seni J. Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 40, no. 1, 2012.

H. Ibda, Bahasa Indonesia tingkat lanjut untuk mahasiswa: Dilengkapi caturtunggal keterampilan berbahasa. Semarang: CV. Pilar Nusantara, 2019.

B. Maduwu, “Pentingnya pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di sekolah,” War. Dharmawangsa, no. 50, 2016.

J. G. Allen, Coping with Trauma. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 2005.

C. V Katemba and G. V Sinuhaji, “Can ESA Method Through Quizizz Games Enhance Vocabulary Knowledge?,” Int. J. Game-Based Learn., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 19–37, 2021.

J. Harmer, The Practice in English Teaching. New York: Longman, 2001.

C. T. Linse, Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. Singapore: The McGraw Hill Company, 2006.

J. Harmer, How to Teach. England: Pearson Education, 2004.

J. Harmer, How to Teach English. London: Longman, 1998.

A. R. Chik, “Model implementasi Outcome-Based Education (OBE) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran kemahiran bahasa Arab untuk bukan penuturnya,” 2016.

P. Ur, A Course in Languange Teaching. Cambrige: University Press of America, 1996.

R. Carter and M. McCarthy, Vocabulary and Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman Group, 1988.

B. S. Bloom, Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982.

J. Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman, 1991.

Brown, Vocabulary Semantics and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press, 1995.

A. M. Ba’dulu, Morfosintaksis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Print, 2005.

D. Nunan, Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: Mc Graw Hil, 2003.

A. Dona, “Teaching Vocabulary By Using Semantic Feature Analysis Strategy For The Young Learners,” Curricula J. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, 2016.

M. Ali, Strategi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Angkasa, 1993.

L. R. Gay, Educational Research: Competencies for Anlysis and Application. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK) ltd, 1981.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30