THE EFFECTS OF LECTURERS’ TEACHING STRATEGY AND STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE ON THEIR READING PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55340/e2j.v11i2.1983Keywords:
Teaching Strategy, Learning Style, Reading PerformanceAbstract
Problem in this research was whether there is a positive and significant effects of teaching reading strategy and students’ learning style on reading performance. The objective of the research was to measure is there any positive significance the effect of teaching reading strategy and students’ learning style on reading performance at English education study program, Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University. This research method was survey design using path analysis approach. Population in this research was all of third semester students at English Education Study Program, Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University with total 40 students which was taken using total sampling technique. The instrument used was a questionnaire (Teaching Reading Strategy & Perceptual Learning Style) and test (TOEFL). This research found that there were: 1) the score of each lecturers’ teaching strategy questionnaire were 80.1% Reciprocal Teaching Strategy, 79% for SQ3R Strategy, 78.5% for Scaffolding Strategy, 77.3% for Think-Aloud Strategy and 75.9% for QARs Strategy. It indicated that one strategy (Reciprocal Teaching Strategy) is always category and four strategies (SQ3R Strategy, Scaffolding Strategy, Think-Aloud Strategy and QARs Strategy) are often category applied by EFL lecturers in teaching reading, 2) the average of each learning style questionnaire were 4.2 for Auditory, 4.2 for Kinesthetic and 4.0 for Visual Learning Style used by students, based on the high percentage of questionnaire, there was 85% or 34 students in major learning style category, it meant the students’ learning style was major learning style, 3) based on the high percentage of reading performance test, there was 65% or 26 students in fair category, it suggests the students’ reading performance was fair, 4) based on the result of hypothesis testing using independent sample T-test obtained fcount 7.951 and obtained significant value 0.001 < 0.005, with a positive effect 0.301 or 30.1% therefore Ha was accepted and H0 was rejected. Thus, it can be concluded that reading performance can be affected by teaching reading strategy and students’ learning style on third semester students at English Education Study Program, Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University.
Downloads
References
J. G. Gebhard, Teaching English as a foreign or second language: A teacher self-development and methodology guide. University of Michigan Press, 2006.
D. Brassell, Comprehension That Works: Taking Students Beyond Ordinary Understanding to Deep Comprehension, Grades K-6. Shell education, 2008.
R. L. Hillerich, The principal’s guide to improving reading instruction. Allyn & Bacon, 1983.
N. J. Anderson, “Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies,” (No Title), 1999.
R. T. Vacca and J. A. L. Vacca, Content area reading. Scott, Foresman Glenview, IL, 1989.
F. Vester, “Denken, lernen, vergessen. 25,” Auflage, München dtv, vol. 49, p. 52, 1998.
R. T. Barruansyah, “The correlation between learning styles, language learning strategies, and English learning motivation of the sixth semester students of STIBA Persada bunda,” J-SHMIC J. English Acad., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2018.
P. Zare and N. Nooreen, “The relationship between language learning strategy use and reading comprehension achievement among Iranian undergraduate EFL learners,” World Appl. Sci. J., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1870–1877, 2011.
M. Khademi, K. Motallebzadeh, and H. Ashraf, “The Relationship between Iranian EFL Instructors’ Understanding of Learning Styles and Their Students’ Success in Reading Comprehension.,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 134–142, 2013.
C. Akdeniz et al., “Learning and teaching: Theories, approaches and models,” Ankara, Turkiye: Cozum, 2016.
H. Hamruni, “Strategi dan model-model pembelajaran aktif menyenangkan,” Yogyakarta Fak. Tarb. UIN Sunan Kalijaga, vol. 65, p. 15, 2009.
K. O. Siwatu, P. Frazier, O. J. Osaghae, and T. V Starker, “From maybe I can to yes I can: Developing preservice and inservice teachers’ self-efficacy to teach African American students,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 209–222, 2011.
Y.-H. Shinn, Teaching strategies, their use and effectiveness as perceived by teachers of agriculture: A national study. Iowa State University, 1997.
R. T. Vacca and J. A. L. Vacca, “Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum,” (No Title), 2005.
J. M. Reid, Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. ERIC, 1995.
L. Selinker and S. M. Gass, “Second language acquisition,” Lawrence Erlhaum Ass, 2008.
A. D. Cohen, R. L. Oxford, and J. C. Chi, “Learning style survey,” Retrieved May, vol. 19, p. 2005, 2001.
B. VanPatten and A. G. Benati, “Key terms in second language acquisition,” 2015.
R. Bajaj and V. Sharma, “Smart Education with artificial intelligence based determination of learning styles,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 132, pp. 834–842, 2018.
W. Grabe, “Teaching and testing reading,” Handb. Lang. Teach., pp. 441–462, 2009.
S. Silberstein, “Techniques and resources in teaching reading,” (No Title), 1994.
W. Grabe and F. L. Stoller, Teaching and researching reading. Routledge, 2019.
C. Snow, Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation, 2002.
M. Gebhard, Teaching and researching ELLs’ disciplinary literacies. Routledge New York, NY, 2019.
C. Harrison, “Understanding reading development,” 2003.
J. B. Grace and K. A. Bollen, “Interpreting the results from multiple regression and structural equation models,” Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 283–295, 2005.
D. Sugiyono, “Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D,” 2013.
D. Phillips, “Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper tests,” (No Title), 2001.
T. Nakanishi, “A meta‐analysis of extensive reading research,” Tesol Q., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 6–37, 2015.
J. W. Creswell, “Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research,” SAGE Handb. Mix. methods Soc. Behav. Res., vol. 2, no. 0, pp. 45–68, 2010.
S. Riduwan, Pengantar Statistika Untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, Dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
S. Rahim, “The use of cognitive strategies to improve the students’ reading comprehension (SMA Putri Yatama Mandiri Boarding School),” Unpubl. Thesis. Makassar Hasanuddin Univ., 2016.
N. Sudjana, “Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar,” 2010.
D. Oktavia and D. Fitriana, “Developing Students’ Reading Comprehension Skill through Reciprocal Teaching Strategy,” in Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9), Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 22–27.
A. S. Palinscar and A. L. Brown, “Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 117–175, 1984.
N. D. Argasetra, “the correlation between learning style and academic achievement of english education study program students of uin raden fatah palembang,” uin raden fatah palembang, 2017.
B. A. Rogowsky, B. M. Calhoun, and P. Tallal, “Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 107, no. 1, p. 64, 2015.
T. S. Amin, “the effect of teaching strategies and learning styles on the students achievement in reading comprehension,” 2014, UNIMED.
S. Van Nguyen and A. Habók, “Designing and validating the learner autonomy perception questionnaire,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 4, 2021
