Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55340/japm.v10i2.1658Keywords:
numeracy skills, assessment of minimum competence (AKM), adversity question (AQ)Abstract
This research aims to determine the effect of Adversity Questions (AQ) on junior high school students' numeracy abilities in solving Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) questions and analysis of students' numeracy abilities in terms of their Adversity Quotient. The research was carried out at SMP Negeri 4 Semarang with a sample size of 157 class VIII students. This research is a combination research (mix method) type The Explanatory Sequential Design. The research results show that there is a significant influence between AQ on junior high school students' numeracy abilities in solving AKM questions. This is proven by testing two variables which shows that the significance value of the AQ variable is less than α with a value of 0.000 (0.000 ≤ 0.05). The simple linear regression equation obtained is Ŷ = 20.731 + 0.318X. This states that for every additional unit of AQ value (X), the student's numeracy ability value (Y) increases by 0.318. The coefficient of determination obtained was 0.342, which means that the influence of AQ on students' numeracy abilities was 34.2%, while survival was 65.8% influenced by other variables. The numeracy abilities of students in solving AKM questions in each AQ category obtained the following results: 1) The numeracy abilities of students in the Quitter category only reached the cognitive understanding process well, but the standard cognitive process was not optimal, so Quitter students did not reach the on cognitive reasoning processes. 2) The numeracy abilities of students in the Camper category have reached the understanding process well, as well as the cognitive process of application, but the reasoning process has not been maximized. 3) The numeracy abilities of students in the Climber category in the understanding, application and reasoning process are maximal.
Downloads
References
Asrijanty, P. .(2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.
Ayuningtyas, N., & Sukriyah, D. (2020). Analisis Pengetahuan Numerasi Mahasiswa Matematika Calon Guru. Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(02), 237–247.
Cahyana, Ade. (2020). “Prospek AKM Dan Survei Karakter: Memperkuat Basis Praliterasi Dan Pranumerasi Usia Dini.” In Banpaudpnf Kemendiikbud, 1–4. https://banpaudpnf.kemdikbud.go.id/upload/downloadcenter/ProspekAKM dan survei karakter - memperkuat basis_1591186022.pdf
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
Ekowati, D. W., Astuti, Y. P., Utami, I. W. P., Mukhlishina, I., & Suwandayani, B. I. (2019). Literasi Numerasi di SD Muhammadiyah. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 93.
GLN. (2017). Materi pendukung literasi numerasi. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Harfiyani, A. P., & D I. (2018). Melalui Budaya Literasi Dalam Konteks. Prosding Seminar Dan Diskusi Nasional Pendidikan Dasar 2018, 2528–5564, 141–150.
Hawa, A. M., & Putra, L. V. (2018). PISA Untuk Siswa Indonesia. JANACITTA,1 (1)
Janah, S. R., (2019). Pentingnya Literasi Matematika dan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dalam Menghadapi Abad ke-21. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 2, pp. 905-910).
Kemdikbud. (2016). Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
Kemendikbud. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. (pp. 1– 125)
Luritawaty, I. P. (2018). Pembelajaran Take And Give Dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis. Mosharafa:Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika , 7 (2), 178-188
Nehru, Nio Awandha. (2019). “Asesmen Komptenesi Sebagai Bentuk Perubahan Ujian Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Dan Problem Solving Menurut Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53(9): 1689–99.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2015 Assessment Framework Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Sardiman, A. M. (2005). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sari, D. C. (2011). Karakteristik Soal TIMSS. Sumber, 38(42), 386.
Stolz, Paul G. (2000). Adversity Quotient (terjemahan T. Hermaya). Jakarta: Gramedia
Sudarman. (2011). Proses Berpikir Siswa Quitter pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Edumatica, 1 (2), 15-24.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sunarna, S., Murtiyasa, B., & Kom, M. (2016). Analisis Butir Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Taksonomi TIMSS Pada Ulangan Akhir Semester Gasal Kelas VIII SMP Kabupaten Sukoharjo Tahun 2015/2016 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Supardi. (2013). Pengaruh Adversity Qoutient Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal formatif 3(1):61-71.
