PERBANDINGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR IPS SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE CERAMAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) PADA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 15 BAUBAU
Keywords:
Student Social Studies Learning Achievement, Lecture Method, Think Talk Write (TTW) Learning ModelAbstract
The problem in this research is whether the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model is more effective than the lecture method in terms of the social studies learning achievement of class VII students of SMP Negeri 15 Baubau on material scarcity and human needs. This study aims to find out the TTW learning model is more effective than the lecture model in terms of social studies learning achievement of class VII students of SMP Negeri 15 Baubau on material scarcity and human needs. This research is a quantitative research using quasi-experimental method. The population in this study included all grade VII students of SMP Negeri 15 Baubau in the Even Semester of the 2019/2020 Academic Year, totaling 35 students. While the sample was taken randomly so that 19 students were obtained in class VII A as the experimental class taught using the TTW learning model and class VII B, totaling 16 students, was selected as the control class taught using the lecture method. Research data collection using social studies learning achievement test instrument. It consists of an initial test (pretest) aimed at knowing the students' initial abilities and a final test (posttest) to determine the students' final abilities. The instrument used has met the valid and reliable criteria. The data were analyzed to meet the requirements in the analysis where the results stated that the data were normally distributed and the pretest data had a homogeneous variance, while the posttest data had a heterogeneous variance. Based on the results of the research data analysis, it can be concluded that the experimental class learning model and the control class method are effective in terms of social studies learning achievement but after being compared based on tcount = 7.16 2› 0.33 and sig. (2-tailed) 0.45 0.05 then Ho is rejected and Hi is accepted, meaning that the TTW learning model is more effective than the lecture method in terms of social studies learning achievement in class VII SMP Negeri 15 Baubau.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi. 2004. Psikologi Belajar. PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta
Arifin .2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip Teknik Prosedur. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung
Arra, C. T., D’Antonio, M. D. & D’Antonio Jr. M .2011. Students’ Preferences for Cooperatife Learning Instructional Approaches: Considerations for College Teachers. Journal of research in Education, 21 (1), 114-126.
Asyirint, Gustaf. 2010. Langkah Cerdas Menjadi Guru Sejati Berprestasi. Bahtera Buku. Yogyakarta
Barkley, Elizabet E,. Cross, Patricia., Major, Claire H. 2012 Collaborative Learning Techniques. Nusa Media. Bandung
Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
Heri Rahyubi. 2012. Teori-teori Belajar dan Aplikasi Pembelajaran Motorik. Referens. Bandung
Karmina. 2013 Studi Perbandingan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Antara Siswa Yang Diajar Dengan Metode Drill dan Metode Tanya Jawab Pada kelas VIII SMP N 1 Mawasangka Timur. FKIP Unidayan. Baubau
Lina Kurniati. 2013. Studi Perbandingan Antara Siswa Yang Diajar Dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad dan Tipe Nht Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Mts AL-Munawwarah. FKIP Unidayan. Baubau
Miftahul, H, M.Pd. 2014. Model-model Pengajaran danPembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta
Rimang, Siti Suwadah. 2006. Dasar Keterampilan Berbicara. Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
Roestiyah. 2001. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta
Robert E. Slavin. 2005. Cooperatif Leaarning. (Narulita Yusron,Terjemahan). Nusa Medi. Bandung
Rusman. 2013. Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta
Sanjaya Wina. 2007. Strategi Pembelajaran: Berorentasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Kencana Predana Media Grup. Jakarta
Shlomo Sharan. 2009. Handbook of Cooperative Learning. (Sigit Prawoto, Terjemahan). Imperium. Yogyakarta
Sujono. 2010. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Kencana. Jakarta
Suriasumantri, J.S. 2005. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer. PT. Pustaka SinarHarapan. Jakarta
Suyono, dan Hariyanto. 2011. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung
Trian Trianto. 2009 Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif: Konsep,
Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada KTSP. Prenada Media Group. Jakarta
University on North Texas (UNT). 2008. Achieve Texas. Clasroom Best Pratices: Cooperative Learning. Texas Education Agency.
Yamin, M., dan Ansari, B. I. 2012. Taktik Mengembangkan Kemampuan Individual Siswa. Referensi (GP Press Group). Jakarta
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.